Assessing Medicare prescription drug plans in four states: balancing cost and access.
نویسندگان
چکیده
Success of the Medicare prescription drug benefit depends on private organizations offering beneficiaries appropriate access to medications while controlling costs. There is limited guidance, however, as to what constitutes best practice in benefit and formulary design. This issue brief examines Medicare stand-alone prescription drug plans in the four most populous Medicare states-California, Florida, New York, and Texas. While there are similar offerings in all four states, there is wide variation in the amount of drugs covered, how drugs are accessed by beneficiaries, and prior authorization requirements. Plans with lower premiums are more likely to have additional formulary tiers and no coverage in the "doughnut hole"-the gap faced by many beneficiaries between $2,250 and $5,100 in costs. Given the many choices facing beneficiaries, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services should monitor experiences to determine whether plans are meeting the needs of Medicare beneficiaries, particularly the frail and disabled.
منابع مشابه
Ensuring Access to Affordable Drug Coverage in Medicare
The long-awaited outpatient prescription drug benefit in Medicare began January 2006. Despite its importance, the drug benefit is controversial. Instead of paying directly for prescriptions, the program will operate through competing private plans. Although it is too early to assess the full impact of Part D on beneficiaries, health plans and providers, employers, and taxpayers, we can discuss ...
متن کاملPersistence in Medicare Prescription Drug Expenditures by Treatment Class
The chronic nature of many prescription drugs used by Medicare beneficiaries suggests that adverse selection could pose a problem in the market for stand-alone prescription drug plans that were created under the Medicare Modernization Act of 2003. Using panel data on the Medicare population from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, we find that prescription drug expenditures are less concentra...
متن کاملComparison friction: experimental evidence from medicare drug plans.
Consumers need information to compare alternatives for markets to function efficiently. Recognizing this, public policies often pair competition with easy access to comparative information. The implicit assumption is that comparison friction—the wedge between the availability of comparative information and consumers' use of it—is inconsequential because when information is readily available, co...
متن کاملFailures of medicare part d delivery and recommendations for improvement.
mularies and benefits to include a full range of treatment options then in use by prescription drug plans. Mandates imposed by the MMA included a requirement that Part D was to provide the most clinically appropriate medications at the lowest achievable cost for all Part D beneficiaries. The MMA also required CMS to acknowledge the specific needs of individuals who were already stabilized with ...
متن کاملMedicare advantage: déjà vu all over again?
The Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act (MMA) of 2003 expands the role of private health plans in Medicare through prescription drug plans and a revised Medicare+Choice (M+C), renamed Medicare Advantage, program. This paper discusses the factors responsible for the failure of M+C to develop as intended in 1997 and analyzes the challenges for MMA implementation in ligh...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Issue brief
دوره 22 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2006